I frequently read Jonathon Turley's columns because I agree with him about the indispensability of the rights enumerated in the First Amendment. Today, Turley takes Yale psychiatrist Amanda Calhoun to task for telling the public that it'll be just fine over the holidays, to cut off communication with your family members who voted for the wrong presidential candidate so you won't be "triggered" by hearing political views contrary to your own.
For Turley, this is a freedom of speech issue. He thinks we need more speech, more communication, more discussion, rather than speech controls and disconnection from family. He also thinks this is especially important in the context of elite universities like Yale. I certainly don't disagree with him.
However, I think the fact that Amanda Calhoun is Yale faculty is much less significant than the fact that she's a psychiatrist. She's encouraging family estrangement in the name of "mental health." I sure hope she gets sued for alienation of affection. (In fact, if anyone who reads this is negatively impacted by Amanda Calhoun's horrible advice for the holidays, or by similar advice of any other psychiatrist, call me, maybe I'll take your case on a contingency fee basis!)
It's not uncommon for psychiatrists to believe that their "expertise" is far more valuable than such a pedestrian thing as family. If only everyone were a good enough "patient" to take the drugs and electric shocks that psychiatrists prescribe, and to totally buy into the "diagnoses" of (fake) brain diseases, we wouldn't even need families, right? If only the psychiatric religion reigned supreme in the USA, we wouldn't need elections either.
Turley thinks Calhoun's view is political. It's not, it's psychiatric. The thing is, psychiatrists like Calhoun actually believe the only rational politics is to put them totally in charge.
They're wrong: that's prescribed harm, prescribed slavery.
No comments:
Post a Comment